Friday, August 29, 2025

Top 5 This Week

spot_img

Related Posts

All or nothing: Why Israel should stand firm, avoid phased hostage deals – editorial

 

Israel will no longer play Hamas’s game of drips and drabs. The demand is simple, moral, and unshakable: all of them, all at once. Nothing less.

By any measure, Israel’s new stance in negotiations with Hamas – that any deal must include the release of all the hostages at once – is the right one. It is right strategically, politically, and most of all, morally.

For nearly two years, Israel has endured the unbearable reality of its sons and daughters held underground in Gaza.

For nearly two years, the families of those kidnapped on October 7 have lived in a torment without end, unsure whether their loved ones will ever return.

And for nearly two years, Israel’s government has wrestled with the excruciating question of how to bring them home without empowering the very enemy that barbarically tore them from their families.

Up until now, the formula has been phased deals. A few hostages here, a few there, in exchange for temporary truces, prisoner releases, or humanitarian concessions.

An illustrative photo of Hamas terrorists with hostage demonstrations in the background.  (credit: Miriam Alster/Flash90, Reuters/Ibraheem Abu Mustafa)
An illustrative photo of Hamas terrorists with hostage demonstrations in the background. (credit: Miriam Alster/Flash90, Reuters/Ibraheem Abu Mustafa)

Each partial deal brought relief to some families, moments of indescribable joy as loved ones were reunited. But each deal also left dozens still trapped in Gaza. Each deal left Hamas with more bargaining chips to play. And each deal kept Israeli society hostage to Hamas’s cynical manipulations.

That model must end. The shift to an “all or none” approach is not just a negotiating tactic. It is a much-needed strategic reset on multiple fronts.

Why Israel needs to switch to an all or nothing approach

First, partial deals have only prolonged the nightmare. Every time Israel agreed to a phased release, Hamas pocketed the gains and came back for more. More time, more leverage, more prisoners freed, and more pressure to halt military operations. This piecemeal process served Hamas’s interests perfectly: keep Israel waiting, keep the world watching, keep the families divided, and keep the terrorist organization calling the shots. Demanding all the hostages at once denies Hamas that advantage.

Second, the previous approach created a cruel hierarchy. Whose child comes home first? Whose parent is left behind? Whose turn is it to suffer longer? By insisting that all must be freed together, Israel affirms a fundamental moral truth: Every hostage is of equal worth. No life is expendable, no family’s anguish is less urgent.

Third, deterrence depends on clarity. As long as Hamas could calculate that abducting Israelis would generate repeated concessions, kidnapping remained a viable strategy. Requiring the release of all hostages at once is the clearest possible message: This tactic will yield no further dividends. The only way forward is to let everyone go.

Fourth, phased deals corrode national cohesion, prolong the whole trauma, and spark bitter protests and internal recriminations. The new position restores fairness and unity: either everyone comes home, or Israel presses on until they do. This is not only just, but it will reduce friction in a society frayed by nearly two years of war, mourning, and political turmoil.

Fifth, it shuts down Hamas’s psychological warfare. The terror group has never viewed the hostages purely in military terms; they are tools in cognitive warfare, designed to divide Israeli society, erode morale, and fracture cohesion. By releasing some while holding others, Hamas deliberately sowed discord and prolonged trauma. Requiring all of the hostages at once closes this front, denying Hamas its most effective psychological weapon.

Sixth, it aligns with Israel’s broader military and political goals. The war aims to dismantle Hamas as a governing and military entity and strip it of the power it held on October 7. Phased hostage deals undercut that aim by prolonging the terror group’s survival as an organization. The demand for the release of all hostages in one stroke supports the larger strategic vision: Hamas’s leverage must end.

Taken together, these reasons make clear that the old model of partial releases has run its course. It prolonged the nightmare, emboldened Hamas, and frayed Israel’s unity.

The new stance, by contrast, closes down avenues of exploitation, strengthens deterrence, and reasserts the principle that every life matters equally. It is natural to grasp at any deal that promises partial relief. But history shows that partial relief has come at the steep price of perpetuating the very captivity it sought to end.

This is not just a new negotiating formula but rather a reassertion of national resolve. Israel will no longer play Hamas’s game of drips and drabs. The demand is simple, moral, and unshakable: all of them, all at once. Nothing less. / jerousalem post

Popular Articles